Legal Opinion
Ford v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 2, 2001No. 5D00-3432PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
776 So.2d 373 (2001)
Clarence FORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-3432.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 2, 2001.
Clarence Ford, Okechobee, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PLEUS, J.
Clarence Ford filed a motion for rehearing after we affirmed per curiam the trial court's order summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion, which alleged three instances of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Ford was convicted of two counts of resisting arrest without violence and other offenses after a jury trial. We deny his motion.
Ford argues…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002