Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Paving Co. v. Gordon Herkenhoff & Associates, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1959No. 6494PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Chief Justice.. This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment for third-party defendant, Gordon Herkenhoff and Associates, Inc., hereafter referred to as Herkenhoff.
On October 3, 1957, plaintiffs (who are not parties to this appeal) filed a complaint against the City of Santa Fe, hereinafter referred to as City and the Metropolitan Paving Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Metropolitan.
The complaint alleged that sometime prior to August 24, 1957, Metropolitan constructed a detour extending from Alameda Street in the City across the Santa Fe…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Russell ex rel. Continental Casualty Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
- Stern v. LaroccaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- James Stewart & Co. v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Spence & Howe Construction Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- Ohio Oil Company v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Albuquerque v. BPLW Architects & Engineers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Arnold v. Stupp CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.