State v. Chiapetta
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Our criminal trespass statute, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 402(1)(D) (1983), provides that a “person is guilty of criminal trespass if, knowing that he is not licensed or privi leged to do so ... [h]e remains in any place in defiance of a lawful order to leave, which was personally communicated to him by the owner or other authorized person.” Defendant Salvador Chiapetta was convicted of that Class E offense in the District Court (Biddeford). He now appeals the judgment of the Superior Court (York County) affirming that conviction. Before us defendant challenges 1) the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LyonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. AnthonySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- KEENAN v. TOWN OF SULLIVANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
- State v. ArmenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.