Legal Opinion

State v. Chiapetta

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 30, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Our criminal trespass statute, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 402(1)(D) (1983), provides that a “person is guilty of criminal trespass if, knowing that he is not licensed or privi leged to do so ... [h]e remains in any place in defiance of a lawful order to leave, which was personally communicated to him by the owner or other authorized person.” Defendant Salvador Chiapetta was convicted of that Class E offense in the District Court (Biddeford). He now appeals the judgment of the Superior Court (York County) affirming that conviction. Before us defendant challenges 1) the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LyonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. AnthonySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. KEENAN v. TOWN OF SULLIVANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  5. State v. ArmenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API