In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Dissent
JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Judge of the Panel
(with whom
EDWARD *1392WEINFELD and STANLEY A. WEI-GEL, Judges of the Panel, join, dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent.
“The objective of the legislation [28 U.S.C. § 1407] is to provide centralized management under court supervision of pretrial proceedings of multidistrict litigation to assure the ‘just and efficient conduct’ of such actions. . . . It is expected that such transfer is to be ordered only where significant economy and efficiency in judicial administration may be obtained.”1 (Emphasis added.) H. R.Rep. No. 1130, 90th Cong.2d Sess. 2, 3 (1968)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving Antibiotic DrugsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
- In Re "East of the Rockies" Concrete Pipe Antitrust CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving Fourth Class Postage RegulationsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.