Rodgers v. Earl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). The complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, states a cause of action for negligence based upon the actions of defendants in removing snow from the public sidewalk abutting their property (see generally, Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275).
The court also properly denied that part of defendants’ motion that, in the alternative, sought summary judgment dismissing the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Roark v. HuntingNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Glick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Jordan v. MusingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Jiuz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guck v. PalozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Alexander v. Westminster Presbyterian ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002