Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Earl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). The complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, states a cause of action for negligence based upon the actions of defendants in removing snow from the public sidewalk abutting their property (see generally, Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275).

The court also properly denied that part of defendants’ motion that, in the alternative, sought summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Roark v. HuntingNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Glick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Jordan v. MusingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Jiuz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guck v. PalozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Alexander v. Westminster Presbyterian ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API