Legal Opinion

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment of the City Court in favor of the plaintiff.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sues as the owner of five interest coupons, formerly attached to bonds issued by the East River Electric Company. These coupons, for thirty dollars each, are upon their face payable at the office of the treasurer of the company in the city of New York, on the 1st day of September, 1888.

The defendant, the Manhattan Electric Company, as the successor of the East River Electric Light Company, admits its lia*597bility and, at some time before the trial, made an offer of judgment for the face of the bonds, with costs, to the date of the offer. It does not appear whether or not the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. Town of SolonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Clokey v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API