Legal Opinion

Serigny v. Thibodaux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1967No. 2671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

In this suit five plaintiffs seek to recover damages arising out of an automobile accident. The defendant tort feasors concede liability. Three plaintiffs, Francis Serigny, Mrs. Anthony Nació and Mrs. Joseph Se-rigny, sustained personal injuries and recovered judgment in damages therefor, and the husband of Mrs. Nació recovered judgment for medical expenses, etc., incurred in connection with his wife’s injuries.

Defendants have appealed from the judgment insofar as it runs in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Nació and Mrs. Serigny, contending that the quantum allowed each by the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Steele v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mistich v. MatthaeiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Eymard v. McKinnonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Sentell v. American Service Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API