Legal Opinion

Otis Elevator Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 18, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit is one under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20), to recover against the United States on an alleged account stated. The petitioner’s position in the pleadings is that by correspondence and by certificate of overassessment the Commissioner of Internal Revenue stated an account relative to income tax payments that showed a balance in favor of the petitioner, as in Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 258, 51 S.Ct. 395, 75 L.Ed. 1018. The amount originally demanded in the petition was $8,319.02, with interest from December 15, 1931; by amendment at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Halpern v. Langrock Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. McMichael v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1945
  4. Franklin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. A. S. Kreider Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API