Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 25, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 216PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The petitioner sustained an industrially related injury on or about 4 April 1966. Her actual average monthly earnings at the time of her injury were less than $200 a month. The sole issue before this Court is whether A.R.S. § 23-1041, sub-sec. F, which section has since been amended, required that The Industrial Commission use a “floor figure” of $200 a month in making its award of permanent compensation.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

After the injury and without a formal hearing having been requested, the petitioner was denied compensation for the reason that the Commission held that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Talley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Magana v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bearden v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Beck v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Diaz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Schmitz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Shaw v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API