Kjar v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court · WhitakerWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiffs, Andrew Kjar and wife, Katherine D. Kjar, sue the United States to recover income taxes and penalties alleged to have been erroneously assessed and collected for the years 1928-1930, both inclusive. Andrew Kjar also sues to recover income taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed against him alone for the years 1931 and 1932. They also sue because they say their property was seized and sold under allegedly erroneous assessments of taxes and sold for a price much less than their true value.
*135Ester Harley Sharon sues because she says her property was levied on and sold as the…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Whitaker.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schmoll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- McClure v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Pedrick. Babcock & Wilcox Tube Co. v. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1964
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Pedrick. Babcock & Wilcox Tube Co. v. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Kjar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949