Legal Opinion

Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. Shields

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1982No. 3-580A137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

GARRARD, Judge.

The appellee, Shields, brought suit against Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. (the manufacturer) for personal injuries which allegedly resulted from Shield’s exposure to the fumes given off from a paint manufactured by Siebert Oxidermo, Inc.

Summons was duly served. When the manufacturer failed to appear by the return date Shields moved for and secured a default. Upon Shields’ request the court proceeded to hear evidence on damages and entered final judgment.

A few days later counsel employed by the manufacturer’s insurance carrier discovered that a default judgment had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Stewart v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Rossow v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Protective Insurance v. SteuberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Kirk v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Groves v. First National Bank of ValparaisoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Berkemeier v. Rushville National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Leibowitz v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Leibowitz v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API