Legal Opinion

City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 11, 1960No. 18699Published

1Opinion of the Court

347 P.2d 919 (1959)

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Municipal Corporation, and John D. McLucas, as Zoning Administrator of the City and County of Denver, Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

DENVER BUICK, INC., a Colorado Corporation, Mollie Cohan, Lou Cohan, and Salco Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Rainbo Bread Company, a Delaware corporation, Weaver-Beatty Motor Company and Roy J. Weaver, Defendants in Error.

No. 18699.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

December 5, 1959.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Dissenting Opinion Filed January 11, 1960.

John C. Banks, Earl T. Thrasher, Hans W. Johnson,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Sutton; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Day.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API