Robert N. Gresham v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, Jfl
Appellant, Robert N. Gresham, challenges the denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.853. Because Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion., In 2004, following a-jury trial, Appellant was convicted of two counts of capital sexual battery and sentenced to life imprisonment. After his conviction, he filed a motion seeking- testing of DNA evidence allegedly found on the victim. Without requiring a response from the State, the trial court denied the motion on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Thomas Glynn Flynt v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Cheshire v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Manual v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Girley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EARL J. RAY, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Robert N. Gresham v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017