Legal Opinion

Keene v. City of Michigan City

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1965No. 20,033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickens, J.

The City of Michigan City instituted action to annex approximately 400 acrés. Thereafter appellants filed their remonstrance under Acts 1905, ch. 129 §243, p. 219, as amended, being §48-702 Burns’ 1963 Replacement. The trial court determined that the remonstrance complied with statutory requirements. On trial the court found facts specially and rendered its conclusions of law and judgment for annexation by appellee city.

This action comes before this court without the aid of a brief from appellees. However, appellees are entitled to the benefit of everything contained in the record which may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Garn v. Board of Election CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ralston v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mertz, Admr. v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Treesh v. DevenyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Muscatatuck State School v. DerringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DOAN v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Day v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Baker v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Renner v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Smith v. Incorporated Town of CulverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API