Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Suter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Wichita Comity. Tried below before Hon. A. A. Hughes, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Associate Justice.

—This is -an appeal by the Fort Worth & Denver City Bailway Company from a judgment in favor of B. H. Suter for one thousand dollars as damages growing out of art overflow alleged to have resulted from a failure of the railway company to maintain proper culverts for the escape of water.

It is first urged that the court erred in the following paragraph of his charge, to wit: “It is the duty of a railway company in constructing and maintaining its roadbed and track to provide and maintain the necessary culverts and sluiceways to carry the waters of all streams which it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API