H. J. Cheney Co. v. Allgeo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Trover by H. J. Oheney Company against Charles E. Allgeo, for the conversion of money, apples, and other property of plaintiff. An order quashing the writ of capias ad respondendum and dismissing the action, is' reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff prosecutes its writ of error in this case to reverse the order of the circuit court quashing the writ of capias ad respondendum by which the suit was *385begun and dismissing the suit. The affidavits in support of the writ allege,, in substance: that H. J. Cheney Company entered into a verbal agreement with said defendant, Charles E. Allgeo, by the terms'" of which said H. J. Cheney Company was to furnish said C. E. Allgeo with money with which to buy apples and with barrels and baskets to be used for containing and shipping said apples; that by the terms of said agreement the apples so…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conrad v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baxter v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Detroit v. Grand Trunk Railway of CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- First National Tire & Reliner Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Kirby v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Sam v. BalardoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.