Legal Opinion

Independent Order of Foresters v. Chauvin

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2005No. 2005-SC-000193-MRPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice ROACH.

In an original action in the Court of Appeals, Appellant, the Independent Order of Foresters (“Foresters”), sought a writ of prohibition against the circuit court on the grounds that Forest Richard Pope’s claims were barred by res judicata. The Court of Appeals denied the petition, finding that Foresters had failed to carry its burden of proof. On appeal, Foresters repeats its claim that Pope’s cause of action is barred by res judicata. Because Foresters has failed to show that its claim is such that the extraordinary remedy of writ is even available, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fritsch v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DickinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Cox v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ridgeway Nursing & Rehabilitation Facility, LLC v. LaneKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lee v. GeorgeKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Radford v. LovelaceKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Estate of Cline v. WeddleKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API