Legal Opinion

Green v. Sumby

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1915No. Appeal, No. 244Published

Appeal, No. 244, Jan. T., 1914, from decree of C. P. No. 8, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 805, in equity, dismissing bill in equity to set aside deeds in case of Charles H. Green v. Elbert A. Sumby. Bill in equity to set aside two conveyances. Before Ferguson, J. The lower court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

If there were any merit in this appeal, the appellant would suffer for counsel’s gross violation of rule 34, relating to the statement of the question or questions involved. The violation of the rule in the present case consists in devoting thirty lines, covering a whole page, to what could have been intelligently stated in less than the prescribed limit. The appeal must be quashed: Duffee v. Bankers’ Surety Company, 247 Pa. 17.

Appeal quashed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duffee v. Bankers' Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915