Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hobbs

District Court, D. Indiana

Decided March 10, 1899No. 5,945PublishedCited by 27 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On demurrer to petition by plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy, against tbe bankrupt and another, (o set aside certain conveyances alleged to have been fraudulent and preferential.

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

On November 19, 1898, Beecher Gtoody-kooniz filed his voluntary petition in bankruptcy, and on the same day he was duly adjudged a bankrupt. On December tí, 1898, Walter Garter was duly appointed a trustee of the bankrupt’s estate, and on December 10, 1898, he tiled his bond, and duly qualified, and assumed the duties of his trust. On March 2, 1899, he filed in this court his amended petition or bill against the bankrupt and Zachariah T. Hobbs, in which he alleges, in substance, that the bankrupt, in his schedule filed herein, transferred as a part of his assets two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  3. Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Ryan v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Southern Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  2. Bear v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  3. The PhilomenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1911
  4. In re BealsDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1902
  5. Hicks v. KnostDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API