Legal Opinion

Anastasio v. Anastasio

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 1942No. 12090PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCTOR, Justice.

This case coming on for trial before Justice Luhring, he ordered proceedings suspended pending the war because of the Italian citizenship of the plaintiff. Reconsideration is sought by plaintiff upon an extensive brief filed in his behalf. Justice Luhring has had no opportunity to consider the brief, due to illness. He may be absent for an extended period, wherefore the court has assigned the matter to me for disposition. No brief is filed in opposition by the defendant.

The undisputed facts indicated by the complaint are that plaintiff, although a subject of Italy, has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Arndt-Ober v. Metropolitan Opera Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Uberti v. MaiaticoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  5. Hughes v. TechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frabutt v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Petition of BernheimerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Verano v. DeAngelis Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Manaka v. Monterey Sardine Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
  5. Stern v. RuzickaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API