Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schloe v. Lead-Deadwood Independent School District No. 106

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1979No. 12592Published

1DissentMorgan, Justice

I dissent.

In my opinion, the result reached by the majority is not supported by the record. I would hold that, upon the record made before the hearing officer, he should have granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction because of appellant’s failure to timely file.*

The majority accepts appellant’s contention that the letter she sent to the Board on April 15 requesting that her name be placed on the recall list constitutes the filing of her grievance and, thus, the grievance was timely filed. The record clearly shows that this contention was not raised at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API