Legal Opinion

Joyner v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 7, 1976No. 46589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari was granted in this cause because of apparent conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, 303 So.2d 60, and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Laiser v. State, 299 So.2d 39 (Fla.App. 4th 1974). Since the granting of this writ, the District Court’s decision in Laiser, supra, has been quashed by this Court in State v. Laiser, 322 So.2d 490 (Fla.1975).

Accordingly, conflict having been dispelled, the writ heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LaiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Laiser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. HaugeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Weisenford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API