Legal Opinion

Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1912No. Appeal, No. 247PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal, No. 247, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland Co., May T., 1909, No. 261, entering judgment non obstante veredicto in case of Philip Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co. Trespass for personal injuries.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 247, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland Co., May T., 1909, No. 261, entering judgment non obstante veredicto in case of Philip Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Auten, J. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for $5,922.50. The following opinion was filed by Auten, J., granting judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto: On the evening of July 14,1908, the plaintiff boarded one of defendant’s cars in the Borough of Sunbury and became a passenger for hire to Island Park, then,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the Common Pleas.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Lentz v. Allentown Bobbin WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Bechtel v. Franklin Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API