Geer v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Presiding Judge.
*127In this interlocutory appeal, Claude Wilson Geer seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion under the anti-SLAPP statute ( OCGA § 9-11-11.1 ) to strike Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.'s ("Phoebe Putney") counterclaim for attorneys' fees. Geer argues that the trial court erred in its conclusion that he did not present a prima facie case that the anti-SLAPP statute applied to Phoebe Putney's counterclaim. We conclude that the trial court properly determined that the anti-SLAPP statute does not apply to Phoebe Putney's counterclaim, and so we affirm.
Geer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- EARTHRESOURCES, LLC. v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Emory University v. Metro Atlanta Task Force for Homeless, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Paulding County Board of Commissioners v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Geer v. Phoebe Putney Health System, IncSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020