Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Stovall

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1969No. 4585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

The District of Columbia, brought this paternity action in Juvenile Court under D.C. Code 1967, § 16-2341 et seq. At the close of appellant’s case, appellee rested and moved for judgment of acquittal. The trial court granted the motion on the ground that appellant had not met its burden. This appeal followed.

Essentially, appellant’s contention is that the testimony of the complaining witness, which was uncontradicted, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the ap-pellee, and that appellee’s failure to rebut required a finding of paternity.

The complaining witness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perlman v. Chal-Bro., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Bragg v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Sa v. MaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API