District of Columbia v. Stovall
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Judge.
The District of Columbia, brought this paternity action in Juvenile Court under D.C. Code 1967, § 16-2341 et seq. At the close of appellant’s case, appellee rested and moved for judgment of acquittal. The trial court granted the motion on the ground that appellant had not met its burden. This appeal followed.
Essentially, appellant’s contention is that the testimony of the complaining witness, which was uncontradicted, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the ap-pellee, and that appellee’s failure to rebut required a finding of paternity.
The complaining witness…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Perlman v. Chal-Bro., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Bragg v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sa v. MaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987