Fowler v. Taylor
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
Subject to exception the plaintiff was not allowed to testify to the talk he had with his uncle, the mortgagee, as to whether there was any money owing to the uncle on the mortgage at any time. The ruling of the Court was based upon R. L., c. 392, s. 25: “Executor party. When one party to a cause is an executor, administrator or the guardian of an insane person, neither party shall testify in respect to facts which occurred in the lifetime of the deceased or prior to the ward’s insanity, unless the executor, administrator or guardian elects so to testify, except as provided in the following…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- House v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Talbott v. HillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Company and Continental Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Phinney v. LevineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- NATIONAL PASTEURIZED EGGS, LLC v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- White v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Henry R. Guild, Jr. v. Meredith Village Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.