Legal Opinion

Matter of Hennessey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 2016No. D-20-16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In 2012, respondent was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of two felony counts of aggravated harassment in the second degree as a hate crime (see generally People v Hennessey, 111 AD3d 1166 [2013]). Upon said conviction, respondent was automatically disbarred from the practice of law (see Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a], [e]; Matter of Barash, 20 NY2d 154, 157 [1967]). This Court’s subsequent acceptance of respondent’s resignation from practice (95 AD3d 1501 [2012]) was therefore superfluous (see Matter of Sanderson, 119 AD3d 1318, 1318 [2014]), but the order nonetheless accomplished the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GolbNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. In re BarashNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. HennesseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re KeeffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of HennesseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API