Legal Opinion

United States v. Thuna

United States District Court

Decided May 28, 2019No. Criminal No. 18-487 (FAB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly"), which is not a party here, requests that the Court enter an Order of Restitution directing defendant Martin Thuna ("Thuna") to pay Lilly $ 2,099,018.01 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sections 3663(a)(2) ("Victim and Witness Protection Act," or "VWPA"), 3664, and 3771(e)(2)(A) ("Crime Victims' Rights Act," or "CVRA"). (Docket No. 23.) The United States and Thuna oppose Lilly's motion. (Docket Nos. 33 & 41.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Lilly's motion for restitution. (Docket No. 23.)

I. Background

On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. InnarelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API