Morales v. Berk Trade School
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCarro, J.
Counsel’s explanation for the inordinate delay, even in the face of two preclusion orders, amounted to “law office failure”, which this court has repeatedly held does not excuse such defaults as occurred here. He did not comply with the previous orders of the court “simply because of various clerical errors in your affirmant’s office regarding this particular file * * * the motion papers which led to these court orders were never seen by your affirmant and were evidently misplaced or mislaid, or were just buried in this voluminous file on this case.” Plaintiff must show exceptional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Greenwald v. ZyvithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Williams v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Williams v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1974