Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dick Gregory v. Larry D. Depte, Sandra L. Henderson and Correction Connection, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 1990No. 89-1260, 89-1688Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBecker, Circuit Judge

This appeal turns almost entirely on properly characterizing two paragraphs in the district court’s February 27, 1989 order. That document provides as follows:

*36[I]t is hereby ORDERED that Gregory and Bourgeois are ADJUDGED in CONTEMPT of this Court, and are sanctioned as follows:

1. Gregory and Bourgeois and their agents ... are enjoined from selling or distributing the products covered by the Exclusive License Agreement between Gregory and CCI other than through regular mail-order channels in quantities no greater than two cans per customer per month to individual end-consumers for the purpose…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API