Nassar v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Klatt, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Rose D. Nassar, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirming an order of appellee, Ohio Liquor Control Commission, denying her application to transfer ownership of a liquor permit. For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment.
{¶ 2} Appellant and her husband, Osama Nassar, own and operate a mini-mart store located at 100 Pershing Avenue in Hamilton, Ohio. They purchased the store from Henry and Dianne Sparks in April 2001 and thereafter sold liquor under the Sparkses’ liquor permit pursuant to a management agreement. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Our Place, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- University Hospital v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharonville v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Suburban Inn, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014