Legal Opinion

People v. Andrew W.

New York County Courts

Decided October 15, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel K. Lalor, J.

In separate proceedings arising from the same alleged incident, the above three defendants have entered pleas to sexual abuse in the first degree upon the understanding that the court, if warranted by the results of the various presentence investigations, would impose in each case a term of five years’ probation, and would consider granting to each defendant youthful offender (YO) status. In fact, since the date of the offense in each case was subsequent to February 1, 2001, sentencing is governed by the Sexual Assault Reform Act of 2000 (L 2000, ch 1,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Jamal G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. Ruben S.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. Sixto M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. BrabhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. Craig M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. TorrezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. Robert A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API