Legal Opinion
Mateo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 19, 2000No. 2D98-438PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
757 So.2d 1229 (2000)
Kem MATEO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D98-438.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 19, 2000.
Gonzalo Alberto Gayoso, Miami, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
DAVIS, Judge.
Kem Mateo appeals his aggravated battery conviction. He argues that the State's charging document did not allege the essential elements for aggravated battery, and he cannot stand convicted of a crime which the State did not charge. We agree and reverse.
The State…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- State v. Von DeckSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Velasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Tolbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nesbitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Nesbitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Levesque v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.