Legal Opinion · Concurrence

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1928No. 4989Published

1Concurrence

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

I concur in thinking that the lower court was, and this court is, bound by the MeConkey Case, and hence that there was no error; but the peculiar character and effect of this “presumption of nonsuieide” perhaps justify further comment. Its origin seeins to be in early cases, which had occasion to and did decide (rightfully, of course) that there is no presumption of suicide, and which then assumed that therefore there is a presumption of nonsuieide — an obvious non sequitur. All authorities agree that in a death action upon an accident policy, and where suicide is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Parramore v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Baltimore & O. R. v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API