Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jefferson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 11, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The defendant brings this bill of exceptions as the result of the denial of his motion for a new trial (see Commonwealth v. Penrose, 363 Mass. 677 [1973]) following pleas of guilty to parts of two indictments (54590 and 54594) and to four other charges.1 The motion was in ef*353feet based on the claim that the pleas were not made voluntarily with an understanding of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the pleas and, therefore, that the defendant was denied his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and art. 12 of the Massachusetts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NolanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. CepulonisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API