Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Turnbull

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph J. Sedita, J.

The parties to this matrimonial action resolved almost all financial and property issues incident to the dissolution of their marriage by a stipulated agreement which they ratified in writing in compliance with Domestic Relations Law § 236. Left for determination by this court is the scope of procedural and substantive rights related to the package of options and fringe benefits interwoven with the plaintiff’s basic postretirement pension. The parties have stipulated that whatever substantive "pension” rights are included in this determination shall be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Sochor v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Biddlecom v. BiddlecomNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API