Legal Opinion

Ford v. Markham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1963No. 5-2892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action hy the appellee to recover double damages under the provisions of Act 283 of 1957, relating to small claims for property damage arising from motor vehicle collisions. Ark. Stats. 1947, §§ 75-918 to 75-920. At the time of the collision the plaintiff’s car was being driven by his wife as a bailee; so any negligence on her part was not imputable to him. Mullally v. Carvill, 234 Ark. 1041, 356 S. W. 2d 238. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the defendant had been “one or two percent” negligent and accordingly entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mullally v. CarvillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stipp v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Bateman v. HeirdCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Bullon v. MonroeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Coudret v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API