Legal Opinion
In Re Burke
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 16, 1987No. 19-10141PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.
Regenesis, an unsecured creditor, moves to have us reconsider the disallowance of its late-filed claim on the grounds that it didn’t have notice its claim was disputed. Because we find that Regenesis’ untimely filing of its proof of claim resulted from a tactical course of conduct rather than from lack of notice, we deny its motion to reconsider the disallowance of its proof of claim.
The facts in this proceeding are derived from the case record, the pleadings, and argument of counsel. 1
Regenesis, a Massachusetts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re V-M Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
- In Re Robintech, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Nutri Bevco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1988
- In Re MurchisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
- In Re AMWC, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
- In re FrederesDistrict Court, D. New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.