United States v. Rietmann Pilcer Co.

Bland, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The Government has appealed to this court from a judgment of the United States Customs Court which sustained appellee’s protest ■against the collector’s classification of and assessment of duty upon •certain imported merchandise under paragraph 1527 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which merchandise is referred to by the appraiser as “pocket powder cases with mirror.”

One of the claims in the protest was that the merchandise was. dutiable under paragraph 385 of said act. In view of our conclusion, the other claims made in the protest are unimportant.

The…