Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cooney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1970No. Appeal, 124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. J ijstice Pomeroy,

In November, 1968, appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, 19 P.S. §1180-1 et seq., alleging the existence of newly discovered evidence and constitutional infirmities at his 1967 trial for murder. Counsel was appointed for appellant and an eviden tiary hearing was held. The court below thereafter dismissed the petition and the instant appeal followed.

For reasons which do not appear of record, appellant has chosen to prosecute this appeal pro se. As we noted in Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. WaltersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. TolbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SangriccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. RauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Brown v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. EsserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API