Legal Opinion

Eatley v. Meyer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This is a suit for alleged negligent malpractice, the defendant being a dental surgeon. The substance of the claim is-that he negligently diagnosed and treated a case of mouth infection as a fractured jawbone. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment of $1,300 and defendant appeals.

Of the eleven grounds of appeal assigned, only three are-argued, viz., refusal to nonsuit; refusal to direct a verdict, for defendant, and refusal to charge the eighteenth request: to charge.

The first two grounds can he considered and disposed of together, as both are based on the proposition that there was.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. LoRocco v. N. J. Manufacturers Indemnity InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Frega v. NORTHERN NEW JERSEY MTG. ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. LoRocco v. NJ Mfrs. Ind. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Stern v. AbramsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Borup v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API