Bronson v. Hitchcock Clinic
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1DissentHoeton, J.
I would reverse the verdict below and grant judgment for the defendant. The trial court should have granted the defendant’s motion for directed verdict. The plaintiff failed to elicit the necessary medical testimony to permit the issue of causation to go to the jury.
It is well-settled that “[w]here the cause of disease, injury, or death of a person is not within common knowledge or experience there must be scientific or medical evidence, that is the testimony of medical experts, to establish the cause and effect relationship between the complained of condition and the asserted cause.” 31A AM.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thorpe v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Burton v. Holden & Martin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Mehigan v. SheehanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Bentley v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.