Tumlin v. Troy Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentSimpson, Justice
I agree with Mr. Justice Brown that the residuary trust provisions of the will violate the rule against perpetuities and the law ■of accumulations.
Due to the great importance of the case, but with great respect for the two' opinions, I should like to give my own analysis of the questions involved, since neither opinion ■exactly expresses my views.
I, likewise, have become convinced that a basic fallacy in the deliverance in the first ■case, where a construction was sought on ■demurrer, is epitomized in the conclusion that the equitable estate vested immediately ■on the death of testator “in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Carter v. Balfour's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Woodruff v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.