Legal Opinion

State v. Chelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 2007No. C032308CR; A125292Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, and menacing, ORS 163.190. He assigns error to the trial court’s ruling that, as a matter of law, defendant was not entitled to assert the defense of use of physical force in defense of property. He also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal.

The facts necessary to dispose of the appeal are few and undisputed. In the small hours of a summer morning, two men wearing dark clothes with the words “Recovery Agent” stenciled on them stopped in front of defendant’s house…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. IrvingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API