United States v. Williams

PER CURIAM: *

The Defendant-Appellant Omar Williams (“Williams”) contends that his guilty plea before the district court was not entered into intelligently and voluntarily and therefore requests that this court vacate his guilty plea. United States v. Reyes, 300 F.3d 555, 558 (5th Cir.2002) (“Because a guilty plea involves the waiver of several constitutional rights, it must be made intelligently and voluntarily.”) (citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242-44, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)). Williams alleges the district court did not comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure…