Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Myers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: R. N. Austin, Judge. The defendants were manufacturers and shippers of lye and potash, under the name Eagle Lye "Works. The plaintiff was a manufacturer of tinware, under the name F. A. Walsh & Co. The plaintiff had, for a long time, manufactured cans for the defendants, from material furnished by them, for an agreed price, for use in their business.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: R. N. Austin, Judge. The defendants were manufacturers and shippers of lye and potash, under the name Eagle Lye "Works. The plaintiff was a manufacturer of tinware, under the name F. A. Walsh & Co. The plaintiff had, for a long time, manufactured cans for the defendants, from material furnished by them, for an agreed price, for use in their business. On August 20, 1889, the parties made a new contract in writing, in the words and figures following: “ Milwaukee, August 20th, 1889. “ Messrs. F. A. Walsh & Oo., City — “ Gentlemen…

1Opinion of the CourtJSTewman, J.

It is urged that the instrument of August 20, 1889, is invalid as a contract, because it does not fix the price to be paid for the cans which were to be manufactured under it, and so was not a completed contract, but only in•choate, ’ leaving most essential terms to be arranged by future agreement. If this is the real effect of the instrument it cannot be deemed a completed contract, nor in force, ■so as to bind the defendants to receive cans from the plaintiff. But it appears that there had been a previous agreement in writing fixing the rate to be paid for such cans as ¿this instrument…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nilson v. MorseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Windmuller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Tufts v. WeinfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Allen v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Excelsior Wrapper Co. v. MessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. McCall Co. v. IcksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wickham & Burton Coal Co. v. Farmers Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API