American Registry of Radiologic Technologists v. Garza
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HILDA G. TAGLE, District Judge.
BE IT REMEMBERED that on March 13, 2007, the Court DENIED Plaintiff American Registry of Radiologic Technologists’ Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend Judgment. Dkt. No. 16.
I. Background
Plaintiff, the American Registry of Radi-ologic Technologists (“ARRT”), first filed its complaint against Defendant, Manuel O. Garza, on November 8, 2005. Dkt. No. 1. The factual background giving rise to this complaint can be found in the Court’s Opinion & Order of May 12, 2006 and is hereby incorporated by reference in this Opinion. Dkt. No. 13.
Plaintiff served Defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. PatelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- In Re StuartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Martin v. BusbyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022