Legal Opinion

Matter of Baldwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1997No. 32S00-9608-DI-571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charges that the respondent, Jeffrey K. Baldwin, violated the Professional Rules -of Conduct for Attorneys at Law by failing promptly to deliver to a client funds that the client was entitled to receive. The Commission and the respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in resolution of this case. Our disciplinary jurisdiction is conferred by the respondent’s admission to this state’s bar on May 31, 1979. We find that the parties’ agreement should…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re NormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API