Matter of Baldwin
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charges that the respondent, Jeffrey K. Baldwin, violated the Professional Rules -of Conduct for Attorneys at Law by failing promptly to deliver to a client funds that the client was entitled to receive. The Commission and the respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in resolution of this case. Our disciplinary jurisdiction is conferred by the respondent’s admission to this state’s bar on May 31, 1979. We find that the parties’ agreement should…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re NormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1999