Legal Opinion
C.H.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 26, 2001No. 2D00-3214PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FULMER, Judge.
C.H.S. appeals his adjudication of delinquency, arguing the trial court erred in finding him guilty of possession of marijuana and loitering and prowling. We affirm the adjudication for possession of marijuana but reverse the adjudication for loitering and prowling.
At trial, Officer Fundermark testified that on May 2, 2000, around 2:30 a.m., he was conducting an area check in a vicinity that had experienced a rash of smash-and-grab burglaries in which the front windows of businesses were broken. As he rounded the corner of a Walgreen’s store, he came into contact with C.H.S. and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- D.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- G.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- B.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- D.S.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Battle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.