Legal Opinion

Konecky v. Camco Wireline, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1996No. S-6419Published

1Opinion of the Court

920 P.2d 277 (1996)

Kevin KONECKY, Appellant,

v.

CAMCO WIRELINE, INC., and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. S-6419.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 26, 1996.

Joseph A. Kalamarides, Kalamarides & Associates, Anchorage, for Appellant.

Timothy A. McKeever and Keri Clark, Faulkner, Banfield, Doogan & Holmes, Anchorage, for Appellees.

Before COMPTON, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and EASTAUGH, JJ.

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The issue before us is whether Kevin Konecky is eligible for vocational reemployment benefits under AS 23.30.041(e). The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API